STELLATE UNILATERAL NONHEREDITARY IDIOPATHIC FOVEOMACULAR RETINOSCHISIS: A MULTIMODAL IMAGING ANALYSIS AND CASE REPORT.

PURPOSE: To describe a case of stellate nonhereditary idiopathic foveomacular retinoschisis in a middle-aged woman and to depict the classic retinal fluorangiography (FA) findings, structural characteristics using macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiographic data of vascular and perfusion density using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A), and standardized multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) findings. METHODS: This is a case report of a 53-year-old ophthalmologist who was incidentally diagnosed with unilateral idiopathic foveomacular retinoschisis. Stellate nonhereditary idiopathic foveomacular retinoschisis is defined as a foveal elevation without alternative explanation for retinoschisis. FA, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, optical coherence tomography angiography, and multifocal electroretinography were used as tools to obtain an integral multimodal diagnosis of this entity. RESULTS: Clinical examination and multimodal imaging were able to detect unilateral idiopathic retinoschisis, revealing a stellate pattern of retinal concentric cysts with minimal changes in vascular and perfusion density metrics and confirming the absence of bridging vessels. There were consistent FA findings, with almost unaltered foveal changes. Multifocal electroretinography depicted a subtle reduction in dark-adapted a-wave and b-wave amplitudes. CONCLUSION: Improvements and innovations in technology for ophthalmic diagnosis have revolutionized our capacity for diagnostic decision-making. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography are useful tools for diagnosis and follow-up assessment. This fortuitous case gives a window on the importance of a routine specialized ophthalmic examination and how multimodal imaging can depict important and specific findings not evident from a clinical point of view. The subtle but important changes observed in optical coherence tomography angiography and multifocal electroretinography will help better define this clinical entity.

Vessel/perfusion density in two optical coherence tomographic angiography protocols: Interchangeable?

INTRODUCTION: Different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) scanning protocols evaluate the macula. OBJECTIVE: To compare the determination coefficients (R2) between vessel and perfusion densities of two OCTA scanning protocols in order to determine if their metrics could be interchanged. METHOD: Cross-sectional, prospective, comparative, observational, study between two OCTA scanning protocols (Angioplex, Zeiss) in healthy subjects. The R2 between central, inner, and full densities (3 x 3 mm protocol) and between central, inner, outer and full densities (6 x 6 mm protocol) was identified, both for vessel and perfusion densities. RESULTS: Seventy-eight eyes were evaluated; subjects' median age was 23 years. There were high R2 between inner and full densities with the 3 x 3 mm protocol (0.96), between outer and full densities with the 6 x 6 mm protocol (0.96), and between central vessel and perfusion densities (≥ 0.96); R2 between central vessel and perfusion densities of different protocols was ≤ 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: Vessel and perfusion densities have high determination coefficients within a scanning protocol, but not between protocols, given that each one preferentially measures different macular areas. Metrics from different protocols should not be interchanged for follow up.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Distintos protocolos de angiotomografía de coherencia óptica evalúan la mácula. OBJETIVO: R2 entre las densidades vascular y de perfusión de dos protocolos de angiotomografía de coherencia óptica, para determinar si sus mediciones podían intercambiarse. MÉTODO: Estudio observacional, comparativo, prospectivo, transversal entre dos protocolos de angiotomografía de coherencia óptica (AngioPlex, Zeiss) en sujetos sanos. Se identificó la R2 entre las densidades vascular y de perfusión central, interna y completa (protocolo de 3 x 3 mm), y central, interna, externa y completa (protocolo de 6 x 6 mm). RESULTADOS: 78 ojos, mediana de edad 23 años. Hubo R2 altas entre las densidades interna y completa del protocolo de 3 x 3 mm (0.96), externa y completa del de 6 x 6 mm (0.96), y centrales vasculares y de perfusión (≥ 0.96); la R2 entre las densidades centrales vascular y de perfusión de distintos protocolos fue ≤ 0.71. CONCLUSIONES: Las densidades vasculares y de perfusión tienen R2 alta dentro de un protocolo, pero no entre protocolos, porque estos miden preferentemente zonas distintas, lo cual limita intercambiar mediciones.

Densidad vascular/de perfusión en dos protocolos de angiotomografía de coherencia óptica ¿Intercambiables? / Vessel/ perfusion density in two optical coherence tomography angiography protocols. Interchangeable?

Resumen Introducción: Distintos protocolos de angiotomografía de coherencia óptica evalúan la mácula. Objetivo: R2) entre las densidades vascular y de perfusión de dos protocolos de angiotomografía de coherencia óptica, para determinar si sus mediciones podían intercambiarse. Método: Estudio observacional, comparativo, prospectivo, transversal entre dos protocolos de angiotomografía de coherencia óptica (AngioPlex, Zeiss) en sujetos sanos. Se identificó la R2 entre las densidades vascular y de perfusión central, interna y completa (protocolo de 3 x 3 mm), y central, interna, externa y completa (protocolo de 6 x 6 mm). Resultados: 78 ojos, mediana de edad 23 años. Hubo R2 altas entre las densidades interna y completa del protocolo de 3 x 3 mm (0.96), externa y completa del de 6 x 6 mm (0.96), y centrales vasculares y de perfusión (≥ 0.96); la R2 entre las densidades centrales vascular y de perfusión de distintos protocolos fue ≤ 0.71. Conclusiones: Las densidades vasculares y de perfusión tienen R2 alta dentro de un protocolo, pero no entre protocolos, porque estos miden preferentemente zonas distintas, lo cual limita intercambiar mediciones.

Abstract Introduction: Different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) scanning protocols evaluate the macula. Objective: To compare the determination coefficients (R2) between vessel and perfusion densities of two OCTA scanning protocols, to learn whether their metrics could be interchanged. Method: Non-experimental, comparative, prospective, observational, cross-sectional study, between two OCTA scanning protocols (Angioplex, Zeiss) in healthy subjects. We found the R2 between central, inner, and full densities (3 x 3 mm protocol), and between central, inner, outer and full densities (6 x 6 mm protocol), both for vessel and perfusion densities. Results: 78 eyes, median age 23 years. There were high R2 between inner and full densities in the 3 x 3 mm protocol (0.96), between outer and full densities in the 6 x 6 mm protocol (0.96) and between central vessel and perfusion densities (≥0.96); R2 between central vessel and perfusion densities of different protocols (≤0.71). Conclusions: Vessel and perfusion densities have high determination coefficients within a scanning protocol, but not between protocols, because each preferentially measures different macular areas. The metrics of different protocols should not be interchanged for follow-up.